DOTCAST /This_is_the_DOT Top Up
Beneficiary:The purpose of this proposal is to top up our total initial request from REF #633 as due to the fluctuation of DOT price we received 30.46% less.
-Initial Request: $90,000, equivalent to 9,355.5 DOT at $9.62 per DOT.
-Received (12.05.24): $62,588.29, equivalent to 9,355.5 DOT at $6.69 per DOT.
-New Request: $30,152.65, equivalent to 4,015 DOT at $7.51 per DOT, this includes 10% buffer.
Remaining DOT’s will be returned back to the treasury, as usual.
View proposal #633 here.
Thank you.
Comments (3)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (60)0.0 DOT
Support0.0 DOT
Nay (9)0.0 DOT
Comments (3)
Another great example of the lack of impartiality of Chaos Dao. While they vote Aye on this proposal, they vote Nay on the referendum 789 with this explanation:
ChaosDAO would like to provide the following feedback from our community. We offer this feedback voluntarily in the spirit of OpenGov, in order to help teams improve their proposals so we can all build the network together.
Some members expressed their desire to see the receipts of the price the received DOT was sold at
Other members stated that price variations in DOT are part of the imperfections of how OpenGov works and we shouldnt change the approach as it could make it gameable
ChaosDAO votes as a collective based on the results of our anonymous internal voting procedures. Our members are not required to provide any feedback about why they have voted in a particular direction. Similarly, to respect our members' right to anonymity, we will not be sharing names of individuals who have chosen to voluntarily provide feedback.
Well done, Chaos Dao, you are a shining example of impartiality!
Disgusting!
ChaosDAO would like to provide the following feedback from our community. We offer this feedback voluntarily in the spirit of OpenGov, in order to help teams improve their proposals so we can all build the network together.
-
ChaosDAO has previously voted on the following referendums from this proposer: 193 - aye; 633 - aye
-
Generally in past discussions regarding DOTCast members are supportive of the effort that Nachito and Roco put into delivering high quality Spanish related content for the Polkadot ecosystem.
-
Due to voting aye on ref 633, voting AYE on the top up seems to have been a clear cut decision for members.
ChaosDAO votes as a collective based on the results of our anonymous internal voting procedures. Our members are not required to provide any feedback about why they have voted in a particular direction. Similarly, to respect our members' right to anonymity, we will not be sharing names of individuals who have chosen to voluntarily provide feedback. We would like to disclose that some of our members are affiliated with this referendum, be that on the submission, operational side or on the curator team. However, the number of affiliated members is vastly outnumbered by the number of non-affiliated members who voted AYE on this proposal. Additionally, our internal processes dictate that those with a COI for a particular referendum must recuse. Therefore we are confident that ChaosDAO's vote unequivocally does not represent a COI.
Another great example of the lack of impartiality of Chaos Dao. While they vote Aye on this proposal, they vote Nay on the referendum 789 with this explanation:
ChaosDAO would like to provide the following feedback from our community. We offer this feedback voluntarily in the spirit of OpenGov, in order to help teams improve their proposals so we can all build the network together.
Some members expressed their desire to see the receipts of the price the received DOT was sold at
Other members stated that price variations in DOT are part of the imperfections of how OpenGov works and we shouldnt change the approach as it could make it gameable
ChaosDAO votes as a collective based on the results of our anonymous internal voting procedures. Our members are not required to provide any feedback about why they have voted in a particular direction. Similarly, to respect our members' right to anonymity, we will not be sharing names of individuals who have chosen to voluntarily provide feedback.
Well done, Chaos Dao, you are a shining example of impartiality!
Disgusting!
ChaosDAO would like to provide the following feedback from our community. We offer this feedback voluntarily in the spirit of OpenGov, in order to help teams improve their proposals so we can all build the network together.
ChaosDAO has previously voted on the following referendums from this proposer: 193 - aye; 633 - aye
Generally in past discussions regarding DOTCast members are supportive of the effort that Nachito and Roco put into delivering high quality Spanish related content for the Polkadot ecosystem.
Due to voting aye on ref 633, voting AYE on the top up seems to have been a clear cut decision for members.
ChaosDAO votes as a collective based on the results of our anonymous internal voting procedures. Our members are not required to provide any feedback about why they have voted in a particular direction. Similarly, to respect our members' right to anonymity, we will not be sharing names of individuals who have chosen to voluntarily provide feedback. We would like to disclose that some of our members are affiliated with this referendum, be that on the submission, operational side or on the curator team. However, the number of affiliated members is vastly outnumbered by the number of non-affiliated members who voted AYE on this proposal. Additionally, our internal processes dictate that those with a COI for a particular referendum must recuse. Therefore we are confident that ChaosDAO's vote unequivocally does not represent a COI.