Polkassembly Logo

OpenGov
View All Fellowship Admin

Updating the Fellowship passive salary rates

inFellowship Admin
2 months ago
Executed

Summary
This is a proposal to update the passive salary rates of the Polkadot Technical Fellowship to a flat annual schedule: $5,000/year for ranks 1-2 and $10,000/year for ranks 3 and above (paid in stablecoins, monthly equivalent of ~416.67 and ~833.33 respectively).
The change will be submitted via the FellowshipAdmin track on OpenGov and takes effect from the first full salary cycle after enactment.

Background
Fellowship members declare themselves as either active or passive. Active members are expected to contribute continuously to the protocol and are compensated at the full rate for their rank. Passive membership acts as a retainer: it recognises rank and past contribution and keeps members within the collective. Passive members are expected to keep their knowledge of Polkadot up to date, but do not carry an expectation of ongoing development work.
Current salary parameters are defined on-chain in fellowshipCore.params() on the Collectives chain (values below annualised from the monthly on-chain amounts):
RankActive salary (unchanged)Passive salary (current)Passive salary (proposed)1$10,000/yr$5,000/yr$5,000/yr (unchanged)2$20,000/yr$10,000/yr$5,000/yr3$80,000/yr$40,000/yr$10,000/yr4$120,000/yr$60,000/yr$10,000/yr5$160,000/yr$80,000/yr$10,000/yr6$200,000/yr$100,000/yr$10,000/yr7–9$200,000/yr$100,000/yr$10,000/yrPassive salary is currently defined as 50% of the active rate at every rank. This proposal replaces that proportional structure with a two-tier retainer, decoupling passive compensation from rank seniority. The higher tier for ranks 3+ reflects the increased participation requirements, notably voting on Fellowship referenda. Active rates are not modified by this proposal.

Why now
Fellowship membership is growing: the JAM Prize and PBA pipelines are expected to roughly double the number of salaried Rank 3 members over the coming year. The salary account will also need to be replenished in the near future, and the Fellowship should make sure its compensation structure is sustainable before making any further funding requests, with Treasury funds concentrated on members actively contributing to the protocol. A flat, modest passive retainer achieves that:
It keeps passive membership meaningful - rank is retained, members stay part of the collective, and returning to active status remains a simple re-registration.
It removes the situation where passive compensation scales with seniority to six-figure annual amounts ($100,000/yr at Rank 6+) without an expectation of ongoing contribution.
It directly reduces the size of the upcoming salary funding request, and every future one.

Comments (5)

2 months ago

Passive salaries of $60,000 - $100,000, what a scam! For doing nothing!
Why was this even tolerated?!?
This corruption, lack of effort, incompetence... no wonder DOT is at -99%.

After 8 years, the protocol earnings are negligible.
But these clowns will only say they keep building!

2 months ago

@14uk...GCEw
https://x.com/thewhiterabbitm/status/2089406834524180923?s=46
This article summarizes how OpenGovernment wasted $300 million. This doesn't include their average six-figure annual salary. Six years of no progress, just PowerPoint presentations. Waiting for them to announce the project's failure.

2 months ago

Yes, a lot of wastage here from passive salaries. The proposed $10k rates are also too steep from a passive standing, but a notable drop from the current figures which is welcome.

Load more comments

Polkassembly is now a read-only archive. Commenting is disabled.

Proposal Passed

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

Polkassembly · Archived 2026 · polkassembly.io

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy