Dear Proposer,

Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is NAY. Below is the evaluation of our voting policy v0.3 on this referendum:

SMALL SPENDER
-------------
8 available members
🟢 0 • 🔴 3 • ⚪️ 0
✓ ≥37.5% required participation met
✘ Ayes ≤50.0% of non-abstain votes
▶ Aye/abstain conditions not met
🔴 NAY

Below is a summary of our members' comments:

Participants cast opposing votes based on concerns that the proposal lacked essential context and clear supporting details. Their comments criticized the absence of thorough background information, with one remark noting the proposal provided no context at all, another pointing out that a mandatory decision deposit was missing, and a third comparing it unfavorably with another similarly context-less bounty. The overall reaction reflected a consensus that the proposal did not offer adequate information to support an informed decision, which ultimately led to a rejection of the measure by the voting body.

The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.

Please feel free to contact us through the links below for further discussion.

Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Decentralized Voices Cohort V Delegate

📅 Book Office Hours
💬 Public Telegram
🌐️ Web
🐦 Twitter
🗳️ Delegate

Poland DAO voted NAy as the proposal is empty