Re-submission of 1678: 6-month renewal | Alan B. Levan - NSU Broward Center of Innovation Membership
I am re-submitting Referendum #1678, which was rejected yesterday. No changes have been made to the proposal content, and I encourage anyone reviewing this new submission to reference the detailed comments and responses already provided on 1678.
Given the high volume of OpenGov proposals - many requesting significantly larger amounts - and the limited 7-day window of the Small Tipper track, I believe some Decentralized Voices (DVs) did not have sufficient time to fully review the proposal. Additionally, due to the timing of 1678’s submission, I was unable to appear on Attempts At Governance (AAG) prior to the close of the decision period.
Following my appearance on AAG today (July 24, 2025), I hope that:
- KusDAO and Hungarian DAO will continue their support, as on 1678
- Trustless Core and JAM Implementers DAO will have time to review and vote
- PermanenceDAO and PolkaWorld will reconsider their original NAY votes
- PolkaWorld: I’ve responded to your latest questions in the DV Delegates – PolkaWorld Open Group Telegram group
- PermanenceDAO: I attempted to book an Office Hours slot, but none were available before August 6. I'm happy to address any questions here or in your Permanence DAO - Public Telegram group
For non-DV communities, including ChaosDAO, I remain fully available to answer any questions or concerns.
Thank you all for your time, attention, and continued engagement.
Comments (4)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (16)0.0 PAS
Support0.0 PAS
Nay (18)0.0 PAS
Comments (4)
James slusser does a great job and got my full support! Aye
~
flipchan
PolkaWorld votes AYE
After initially voting NAY, the proposer shared more information in PolkaWorld’s Telegram group, leading us to change our vote to AYE. The amount requested is small, but it could serve as a valuable leverage point. https://t.me/DVpolkaworld/500
Read more feedback here.
James slusser does a great job and got my full support! Aye
~
flipchan
PolkaWorld votes AYE
After initially voting NAY, the proposer shared more information in PolkaWorld’s Telegram group, leading us to change our vote to AYE. The amount requested is small, but it could serve as a valuable leverage point. https://t.me/DVpolkaworld/500
Read more feedback here.