Ratify Payout APPROVED by Ref. 1390 - Talisman Mobile Wallet
Beneficiary:TL;DR
The payout for Ref. 1390 (Talisman Mobile App Proposal) expired before we could claim. This ref intends to rectify the payout that was originally approved under Ref. 1390.
The preimage was pulled as an additional measure to prove that the payout was not disbursed.
Q: Why was the payout not claimed?
A: Due to an oversight on our part, we failed to track the timeline properly and missed the deadline to claim the payout.
Q: What is the purpose of this proposal?
A: Since the claim on our previously approved proposal has expired, we are currently unable to claim the originally approved funds. We are submitting this proposal to rectify this so that we may continue to deliver on the original proposal.
Q: Are you still planning to fulfill the proposal?
A: Absolutely, and we have already started. We are already several weeks into the design with the first set of wireframes ready to start user testing, and have completed a number of key technology components in preparation for the mobile app. We, as well as our community are excited to bring the Talisman mobile experience to life.
Q: Proof the preimage was pulled?
A: You can verify it here - pulled after confirmation and expiry of the claim period.
Q: Can you verify the payment address?
A: Yes, the payment address is a Talisman-controlled multisig, identical to the one used in the original proposal.
Your vote will accelerate the rectification of this payout previously approved. Thank you for the support! 🙏❤️
Comments (7)
Proposal Passed
3
of 3Summary
0%
Aye
0%
Nay
Aye (101)0.0 PAS
Support0.0 PAS
Nay (7)0.0 PAS
Comments (7)
Hello.. can you share details about the reason the claim was no executed?
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received seven aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The voters expressed general support for the proposal despite some concerns regarding prior oversights in the funding process. They acknowledged a previous approval and emphasized the importance of careful management moving forward. While some comments highlighted a desire for better attention to detail in future claims, the overall sentiment remained positive, with all participants ultimately voting in favor of the referendum. The group seemed optimistic about the proposal's potential, looking forward to improved practices in the future.
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO
Hello.. can you share details about the reason the claim was no executed?
Dear Proposer,
Thank you for your proposal. Our first vote on this proposal is AYE.
The Big Spender track requires 60% quorum according to our voting policy. This proposal has received seven aye and zero nay votes from ten members. Below is a summary of our members' comments:
The full discussion can be found in our internal voting.
Kind regards,
Permanence DAO