Polkassembly Logo

OpenGov
View All Medium Spender

RegionX - Coretime Marketplace Production Deployment Phase 1

inMedium Spender
2 years ago
coretime
Executed

Short Description

The RegionX parachain implements a trustless Coretime marketplace and an order model for indicating Coretime demand. All required functionality of the parachain has been implemented, and we would like to proceed with deploying it into production, as we see that many teams would benefit from the features it provides. The parachain will delegate its governance and revenue to DOT holders (KSM for the Kusama parachain). This is the Phase 1 proposal, where we are first seeking funding to proceed with deployment on Kusama and to refine the Coretime Hub user interface for improved design and user experience.

Context

We have observed that Coretime sales have been live on Polkadot for some time, and there is no denying that Coretime is currently very cheap. Right now Polkadot has more resources to offer than the current demand it has. However, this isn’t because ‘there are no projects on Polkadot’, but rather because Polkadot is really scalable and can host a bunch of rollups.

We believe Polkadot is currently the best platform for hosting rollups, and the main focus in the upcoming period should be to market this fact and attract new teams to the ecosystem. This is something we also want to be actively involved in moving forward.

However, just because Coretime is cheap right now doesn’t mean there is no demand for a trustless Coretime marketplace. We talked with multiple teams from ecosystems that would have benefited from a deployed Coretime marketplace.

The current main reasons we believe it is important to have the marketplace deployed on both Polkadot and Kusama:

  • With more projects deployed and with elastic scaling being used by bigger projects, it is likely that the demand for Coretime will highly increase. This scenario would highly require a secondary marketplace where Coretime can be purchased after all cores are sold on the bulk sale.
  • The bulk sale only offers Coretime for the upcoming bulk period, meaning it is not possible to purchase Coretime for immediate use. This can be an issue for projects that missed purchasing Coretime during the bulk sale or for those that experience increased on-chain activity and need to scale up with an additional core.
  • Many parachains considering deployment on Polkadot would likely want a secondary marketplace for purchasing Coretime—either to scale on the go or to ensure there is still a trustless way to procure Coretime if the bulk sale sells out.

A Common Good Chain, but Not a System Parachain

We aim to make the RegionX parachain a common good parachain with DOT as its native token.

DOT will serve as the primary currency for all chain functionality, meaning governance will be delegated to DOT holders, and all fees will be charged in DOT. As a result, the RegionX treasury will also be managed by DOT holders through governance.

However, we don’t want to make the RegionX parachain a system chain. The main reason is that this would delegate the parachain's maintenance to the Polkadot Fellowship, which already has many things to look after. We believe it is better to have a dedicated team specifically focused on working on and maintaining the RegionX parachain.

Link to the proposal document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16OzV_c0sk8t-NvKXklswDATiT76NGp-YBD2TglSScxI/edit?usp=sharing

Comments (8)

2 years ago

If the rationale behind proposing a Parachain is to enable more flexible programmability, I have a number of proposed solutions that we can pursue via RFCs and would be more sustainable long term:

  1. Coretime NFTs should be transferrable to AH, where contracts can manipulate them, send them back to Coretime-chain, and then used.
  2. Eventually, AH itself can become a trusted source for Coretime information, not needing the results to be sent back.
  3. This leads the way to potentially merging Coretime-chain and AH, making Coretime NFTs fully programmable in the same environment where staking, DOT and governance is.

While step 3 is more controversial, step 1 and 2 are not, and I believe they can fulfill most of your requirements, avoiding the need for another parachain.

2 years ago

Thanks for your work on this proposal. I read through it, including why you’re asking for funds directly from the Polkadot Treasury.

I’ll have to vote NAY here, because I think it’d be better to request Phase 1 funding from the Kusama Treasury first. Once Phase 1 is done, you could then ask Polkadot for Phase 2 funds. This way, it fits better with how Kusama (for early-stage projects) and Polkadot (for more mature ones) usually work.

Hope you’ll consider this option! I’m happy to discuss it further if needed.

Load more comments

Polkassembly is now a read-only archive. Commenting is disabled.

Requested

USDT
90.07K USDT

Proposal Passed

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

Polkassembly · Archived 2026 · polkassembly.io

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy