Polkassembly Logo

Head 1
Head 3
Head 4
Create Pencil IconCreate
TRACKS
ORIGINS
Report an issueNeed help with something?
Foot 1
Foot 2
Foot 3
Foot 4
OpenGov
View All Small Tipper
Requested:45 DOT
Executed

Retroactive tip request for retro posters

inSmall Tipper
a year ago
BeneficiaryBeneficiary:

(45 DOT)

GM, I am requesting 45 DOT (5 DOT each) for nine retroactive posters I created and published on X in March 2024.

On average, each post have: ~3k Impressions ~70 Likes ~10 retweets.

I spent between 1 and 3 hours to create each poster.

The process was basically:

  • Figuring out the theme and slogans.
  • Experimenting on midjourney to create images.
  • Getting everything together on PS with final touches (and mixing multiple AI generated images for some of them).

Download link for high-res posters:

  • https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/11pd-unKTk3ICtCdqjeMDJAPdGv7opBEN?usp=sharing

You can see the posts from the following links:

  • https://x.com/xcjeeper/status/1764341057880302020

  • https://x.com/xcjeeper/status/1765506360668528720

  • https://x.com/xcjeeper/status/1766155472933949936

  • https://x.com/xcjeeper/status/1766770416054370525

  • https://x.com/xcjeeper/status/1767937079076327631

  • https://x.com/xcjeeper/status/1769340957130928209

  • https://x.com/xcjeeper/status/1770103889095753850

  • https://x.com/xcjeeper/status/1770884632008929523

  • https://x.com/xcjeeper/status/1772578100292825428

Comments (1)

a year ago

Cool. I was wondering how you would value this single tweet as of this writing (4,614 Views, 25 reposts, 93 likes):

https://x.com/TheDotsMagazine/status/1820793216565719196

Video requires more production, is funnier (but less informative), but might be more memorable because its funny.

Its so sad that these posters only get 3K views.

I believe content like these should be part of a Twitter ads campaign, to not have 1K-5K views but like 1MM views (which cost $500-1000). See 324 and #577 which was systematically rejected as being "too much money" or something "we don't know the ROI for this". Part of the issue is the word "Ad", which makes people cringe, and the fact that its not organic. But your posters are very ad-like.

It would cool to compensate people a going rate of $x per thousand views for "organic".

45 DOT*$5 DOT/(9 posters*3K)=$8.33 CPM

By the above math
https://x.com/TheDotsMagazine/status/1820793216565719196
would be "worth" paying $38.43.

Very curious about your thoughts about it.

PleaseLogin to comment

Proposal Passed

3

of 3

Summary

0%

Aye

AyeNay

0%

Nay

Aye (17)0.0 DOT

Support0.0 DOT

Nay (7)0.0 DOT

Comments (1)

a year ago

Cool. I was wondering how you would value this single tweet as of this writing (4,614 Views, 25 reposts, 93 likes):

https://x.com/TheDotsMagazine/status/1820793216565719196

Video requires more production, is funnier (but less informative), but might be more memorable because its funny.

Its so sad that these posters only get 3K views.

I believe content like these should be part of a Twitter ads campaign, to not have 1K-5K views but like 1MM views (which cost $500-1000). See 324 and #577 which was systematically rejected as being "too much money" or something "we don't know the ROI for this". Part of the issue is the word "Ad", which makes people cringe, and the fact that its not organic. But your posters are very ad-like.

It would cool to compensate people a going rate of $x per thousand views for "organic".

45 DOT*$5 DOT/(9 posters*3K)=$8.33 CPM

By the above math
https://x.com/TheDotsMagazine/status/1820793216565719196
would be "worth" paying $38.43.

Very curious about your thoughts about it.

PleaseLogin to comment

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

A House of Commons Initiative.

Polka Labs Private Limited 2025

All rights reserved.

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy