Closing Bounty 49. Technical Support Bounty.
It seems like this bounty doesn't have neither proactive activity nor reactive activity as there is only one child bounty granted.
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/bounties/49
https://polkadot.subsquare.io/treasury/child-bounties/49_2672
This bounty was meant to be proactive and reward developers envolved in BD pushes and other technical efforts but in 8 months it's had no activity. We would like to hear if there are parties interested in the funds of this bounty because as of now all active BD efforts don't depend on it as they are working in parallel and with more specific goals as well as geographically specific objectives. Otherwise, we'd like to hear if there are grounds for closing this bounty due to inactivity and lack of impact on BD efforts. A poll is included on this discussion, Voting AYE means closing the bounty NAY, means leaving it active but more than anything, we would like to hear the reasons why this bounty should or shouldn't be closed.
Let's kickstart the discussion.
Comments (3)
Comments (3)
change of curator set to more active participants and expand it to support asset hub integration to payment processors. f.g. ability to pay bitrefill, bitpay, travala etc. services in usdt/usdc/dot on asset hub as well as exchange integrations like kraken. these simple integrations feels most important bd to be done in ecosystem, to lay bedrock for smart contracts to be accessible
I believe the Bounty should continue to operate, but it definitely needs new curators and perhaps a broader focus. I've frequently seen developers in need of technical advice on Discord (maybe there are areas where this bounty could help here). It's an important bounty that could assist in the onboarding of several projects to Polkadot. In my opinion, it needs a new approach and more visibility.
change of curator set to more active participants and expand it to support asset hub integration to payment processors. f.g. ability to pay bitrefill, bitpay, travala etc. services in usdt/usdc/dot on asset hub as well as exchange integrations like kraken. these simple integrations feels most important bd to be done in ecosystem, to lay bedrock for smart contracts to be accessible
I believe the Bounty should continue to operate, but it definitely needs new curators and perhaps a broader focus. I've frequently seen developers in need of technical advice on Discord (maybe there are areas where this bounty could help here). It's an important bounty that could assist in the onboarding of several projects to Polkadot. In my opinion, it needs a new approach and more visibility.