Polkassembly Logo

OpenGov
View All Discussion

Proposal for Enhancing Transparency and Fairness in Crowdloan Projects

userPolkaFinanceSage
3 years ago
crowdloan
fair
auction
community
threaten

Dear Polkadot Community Members,

First and foremost, I woulid like to extend my deep gratitude to the POLIMEC project team. They have responded to our community's concerns with great sincerity and a proactive attitude. Through their efforts and attention to the community, we have collectively found a solution that is beneficial to all parties involved.

I also want to thank the community members for their ongoing attention and participation.

Sincerely,

PolkaFinanceSage

Comments (2)

3 years ago

@PolkaFinanceSage 

This is awful, if true. I would be interested in seeing some response from POLIMEC. Where did they claim the crowd loan was self funded?

3 years ago

@PolkaFinanceSage 

How did you know about the crowdloan if it wasn't advertised? Did you stake tokens into #3344 anonymous crowd loan project without knowing who was behind it or what it was?

Presumably, the small number of crowdloan funders that POLIMEC mentioned are known personally to them and have a stake in the parachain business. If this is the case, a self-funded tag could be reasonable as they may be remunerated in other ways.

Polkassembly is now a read-only archive. Commenting is disabled.

Help Center

Report an Issue
Feedback
Terms and Conditions
Github

Our Services

Docs
Terms of Website
Privacy Policy

Polkassembly · Archived 2026 · polkassembly.io

Terms and ConditionsTerms of Website
Privacy Policy